From a0146a1f91bc5eda91d1e98eb9e09f19ea28a24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dcbot <_>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:29:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix: use if/else instead of ifn() in hash evaluation

---
 base/mp_rowhash.sas | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/base/mp_rowhash.sas b/base/mp_rowhash.sas
index b4fb7b1..38c6e03 100644
--- a/base/mp_rowhash.sas
+++ b/base/mp_rowhash.sas
@@ -73,12 +73,10 @@
       /*
         multiply-by-one for consistent cross-system precision.
         Ignore null to protect SAS special missing values.
+        Cannot use IFN() as it evaluates both sides
       */
-      &normal = ifn(
-        missing(&nums[&i]),
-        &nums[&i],
-        &nums[&i] * 1
-      );
+      if missing(&nums[&i]) then &normal = &nums[&i];
+      else &normal = &nums[&i] * 1;
       &numtext = put(&normal, binary64.);
       &digest = md5(trim(&numtext));
       substr(&pair,  1, 16) = &state;