diff --git a/base/mf_dttm.sas b/base/mf_dttm.sas
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a577bba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/mf_dttm.sas
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/**
+ @file
+ @brief Returns E8601DT26.6 if compatible else DATETIME19.3
+ @details Per our experience in [Data Controller for SAS]
+ (https://datacontroller.io) deployments, the E8601DT26.6 datetime format has
+ the widest support when it comes to pass-through SQL queries.
+
+ However, it is not supported in WPS or early versions of SAS 9 (M3 and below).
+
+
+
Related Macros
+ @li mf_dttm.test.sas
+
+ @author Allan Bowe
+**/
+
+%macro mf_dttm(
+)/*/STORE SOURCE*/;
+
+%if "&sysver"="9.2" or "&sysver"="9.3"
+ or ("&sysver"="9.4" and "%substr(&SYSVLONG,9,1)" le "3")
+ or "%substr(&sysver,1,1)"="4"
+ or "%substr(&sysver,1,1)"="5"
+%then %do;DATETIME19.3%end;
+%else %do;E8601DT26.6%end;
+
+%mend mf_dttm;
+
+
diff --git a/tests/crossplatform/mf_dttm.test.sas b/tests/crossplatform/mf_dttm.test.sas
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d1fbf7a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/crossplatform/mf_dttm.test.sas
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/**
+ @file
+ @brief Testing mf_dttm macro
+
+ SAS Macros
+ @li mf_dttm.sas
+ @li mp_assert.sas
+ @li mp_assertscope.sas
+
+**/
+
+%global test1;
+
+%mp_assertscope(SNAPSHOT)
+%let test1=%mf_dttm();
+%mp_assertscope(COMPARE,ignorelist=test1)
+
+%mp_assert(
+ iftrue=("&test1"="DATETIME19.3" or "&test1"="E8601DT26.6"),
+ desc=Basic test,
+ outds=work.test_results
+)